Access Keys:
Skip to content (Access Key - 0)

How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Montori V, Cinà C, Tandan V, Guyatt GH, Evidence-Based Surgery Working Group. Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg 2004;47(1):60-7.

Abstract

An evidence-based approach to surgery incorporates patients’ circumstances or predicaments, identifies knowledge gaps and frames questions to fill those gaps, conducts efficient literature searches, critically appraises the research evidence and applies that evidence to patient care. The practice of evidence-based medicine, therefore, is a process of lifelong self-directed learning in which caring for patients creates a need for clinically important information about diagnoses, prognoses, treatments and other health care issues.

Readers are able to utilize several types of summarized information from expert opinion and textbook reviews to systematic reviews. Traditional, or narrative, reviews, by definition, do not use a systematic approach to identifying information on a particular topic. Moreover, narrative reviews often pose background-type questions and provide a general overview of a topic such as those found in book chapters and instructional course lectures. A background question is, for example, “What is the epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment options and prognosis following femoral shaft fractures in adults?” We use the term systematic review for any summary of the medical literature that attempts to address a focused clinical question with explicit strategies for the identification and appraisal of the available literature; meta-analysis is a term used for systematic reviews that use quantitative methods (i.e., statistical techniques) to summarize the results. Systematic reviews typically pose a foreground-type question. Foreground questions are more specific and provide insight into a particular aspect of management. For instance, investigators may provide a systematic review of plating versus nailing of humeral shaft fractures on nonunion rates (foreground question) rather than a general review of how bone heals after all treatments of humeral shaft fractures (background question).

Whereas systematic reviews (and meta-analyses) have become popular in surgery, they are not without limitations. The quality of the systematic
review is influenced by the quality of the primary studies being reviewed. However, in the absence of large, definitive clinical trials, meta-analyses can provide important information to guide patient care as well as future clinical research.

In applying the suggested guidelines you will gain a clear understanding of the process of conducting a systematic review.

The conduct and interpretation of systematic reviews in surgery is often challenging given the paucity of clinical trial available on any given topic. However, if investigators adhere to proper methodology, they can provide conclusions drawn from a comprehensive study with limited bias.

View on PubMed

Download PDF

Peer Review

OrthopaedicsOne Peer Review Workflow is an innovative platform that allows the process of peer review to occur right within an OrthopaedicsOne article in an open, transparent and flexible manner. Learn more

Instructions for Authors

Read our Instructions for Authors to learn about contributing or editing articles on OrthopaedicsOne.

Content Partner

Learn about becoming an OrthopaedicsOne Content Partner.

Academic Resources

Resources on How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis from Pubget.

The license could not be verified: License Certificate has expired!
Orthopaedic Web Links

Internet resources validated by OrthopaedicWebLinks.com

The license could not be verified: License Certificate has expired!
Related Content

Resources on How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis and related topics in OrthopaedicsOne spaces.

Page: How to use an article about a diagnostic test (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to use an article evaluating surgical interventions (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to use an article on economic analysis (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to use an article reporting population-based volume-outcome relationships in surgery (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to perform a literature search (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Self-audit and practice appraisal for surgeons (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to use a decision analysis (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: How to assess an article on health-related quality of life (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Showing first 10 of 25 results