Access Keys:
Skip to content (Access Key - 0)

Mechanisms for Quality Assurance of Orthopaedic Webpages

For webpages there are at least three levels of quality assessment that may be desirable. The first would be provenance, the second content coverage and the third the quality of that coverage. The "provenance" quality is most easily assessed. Silberg et al. (1997) proposed the four criteria of authorship, disclosure, attribution and currency. While these are important, it remains true that a site could satisfy all these criteria and still be misleading or inadequate. Clough & Oliver (2002) proposed that orthopaedic patient information pages on the Internet should cover a set of topics relating to the condition, nonoperative treatment, and operative management. However, even if those topics are covered, there is no certainty that they are covered well. Informatics faces a huge task defining and assessing quality. It will involve the creation of standards, the assessment of pages against those standards and some form of "enforcement" of those standards. An intriguing finding comes from a study of patient information on carpal tunnel syndrome . Fricke et al found that "indicators that make use of the invisible link structure of the Internet are more reliable guides to accurate information". This suggestion that better pages received more links should be further studied and implies an inherent quality mechanism in the Internet.
Some form of central directory of orthopaedic information would seem to be essential to any quality control mechanism. If a listing on the directory became a desirable promotion of traffic to the site (i.e. readership), then the directory itself would be in a position to suggest standards.

Peer Review

OrthopaedicsOne Peer Review Workflow is an innovative platform that allows the process of peer review to occur right within an OrthopaedicsOne article in an open, transparent and flexible manner. Learn more

Instructions for Authors

Read our Instructions for Authors to learn about contributing or editing articles on OrthopaedicsOne.

Content Partner

Learn about becoming an OrthopaedicsOne Content Partner.

Academic Resources

Resources on Mechanisms for Quality Assurance of Orthopaedic Webpages from Pubget.

Error rendering macro 'rss' : The RSS macro is retrieving an HTML page.
Orthopaedic Web Links

Internet resources validated by OrthopaedicWebLinks.com

Related Content

Resources on Mechanisms for Quality Assurance of Orthopaedic Webpages and related topics in OrthopaedicsOne spaces.

Page: Electronic health records (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Orthopaedic Subject Classification (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Push Technology in Orthopaedics (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Electronic Skills (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Mechanisms for Quality Assurance of Orthopaedic Webpages (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Evidence Based Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Informatics (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Overview of Orthopaedic Informatics (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Integration of Orthopaedic Journals and the Internet (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Scope of Orthopaedic Informatics (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Page: Orthopaedics on the Internet (OrthopaedicsOne Articles)
Showing first 10 of 13 results