• st described by Holger Scheuermann in 1921, a Danish physician
  • Structural deformity characterized by anterior wedging of ³5° of three adjacent thoracic vertebrae (Sorensen, 1964); ³50° thoracic kyphosis abnormal
  • Secondary radiographic findings of Schmorl’s nodes, endplate narrowing, irregular endplates
  • Adolescents typically present secondary to cosmetic deformity; adults secondary to pain
  • Etiology unclear, indications for treatment debatable

Normal Thoracic Kyphosis

  • Curvature extends from T2-T12 w/ T7 most dorsal vertebrae
  • Anterior elements of spinal column resist compressive forces, posterior ligamentous structures resist tensile forces
  • Kyphotic deformity may occur if anterior column unable to withstand compression, causing shortening of anterior column
  • Typically increases throughout life; sagittal alignment of the thoracic spine displays a range of normal that is dynamic
  • Scoliosis Research Society:
    1. Normal range thoracic kyphosis for growing adolescent 20-40°
    2. Any kyphosis at thoracolumbar or lumbar area abnormal


  • Prevalence of 0.4 to 8.3% (Sorensen, 1964)
  • Two studies that Sorensen cited in 1951, 1955 reported prevalence of 0.4% – may have contained inherent bias as included only men rejected for military service
  • Prevalence of 7.4% in subsequent review of 1,384 cadavers (Scoles, 1991)
  • Prevalence approximately equal in males and females
  • Radiographic findings c/w Scheuermann’s not visible until age 12-13 (puberty); Hence, adolescent girls typically evidence findings 1st 


  • Many theories proposed but has yet to be elucidated
  • Scheuermann hypothesized that AVN of ring apophysis (ring of cartilage about developing vertebral body) leads to premature cessation of growth anteriorly à vertebral body wedging
  • Schmorl postulated that herniations of disk material through vertebral endplates lead to loss of disk height and anterior wedging
  • Underlying genetic factor suggested (Halal, 1978; Skogland, 1985)
  • Correlation with height and increased levels of growth hormone (Ascani, 1990)
  • Gross anatomic findings: thickened ALL, narrowed vertebral disks, wedged vertebral bodies
  • Histologic abnormality: decreased collagen to proteoglycan ratio in matrix of endplate à ?alteration in ossification and thus altered vertical growth
  • Early osteoporosis may be an etiologic factor
  • Mechanical factors: Scheuermann found high incidence in industrial workers

Clinical Evaluation

  • Indications for treatment can be grouped into five categories: pain, progression of deformity, neurologic compromise, cardiopulmonary compromise, cosmesis
  • Pain 50% (Sorensen, 1964)- Adolescents often p/w cosmetic or postural complaints; adults – pain

    – Usually paraspinal, just distal to apex of deformity

    – Often activity-related, relieved by rest; sometimes simply early fatigue
  • Progression of deformity- Pay attention to h/o curve; delays in Dx possible if ignored, thought to be just poor posture
  • Neurologic compromise- Cord compression mandates surgical treatment (rare)

    – Ranges from acute onset unilateral radiculopathy to insidious onset spastic paraplegia

    – 54° (Ryan and Taylor, 1982) to 95° (Lonstein, 1980)

    – Extradural cysts and thoracic disk herniations may contribute
  • Cardiopulmonary compromise      – Extremely rare on initial presentation

            – Sorensen reported no negative effects

            – Murray reported restrictive pulmonary disease in curves >100° w/ apex in upper thoracic region
  • Cosmesis      – Address w/ patient
  • Physical Exam      – Sagittal deformity fairly rigid in hyperextension; in postural kyphosis, more correctable

            – Have patient bend forward, view deformity from side ("A-frame")

            – Typically increased cervical and lumbar lordosis

            – Shoulder girdles often rotated anteriorly

            – Evaluate for hamstring tightness, lower extremity neurologic function

Radiologic Evaluation

  • Routine studies: AP & lateral (standing) XR of entire spine on long films and hyperextension lateral of thoracic spine
  • Lateral XR: Schmorl’s nodes, disk space narrowing, irregular endplates, vertebral wedging ³5° of three adjacent bodies (use Cobb technique)
  • Lateral XR: r/o lumbar hyperlordosis, spondylolysis (30-50%), degenerative
  • AP XR: r/o scoliosis (1/3 Scheuermann’s kyphosis)
  • Lateral XR in hyperextension: to assess flexibility of kyphosis; r/o postural kyphosis (as much as 60° deformity correctable) – Schmorl’s nodes, etc. absent
  • Presence of anterior bar à congenital kyphosis       

Natural History

  • Wide variation in natural history; patients w/ mild deformities have few clinical sequelae but a subset of patients have refractory symptoms
  • Back pain and fatigue in adolescent may improve w/ skeletal maturity
  • Paajaanen et al(1989) reported 55% of disks in young adults w/ Scheuermann’s w/ abnormal MRI changes (rate five times that in asymptomatic controls)
  • The Natural History and Long-term Follow-up of Scheuermann Kyphosis (JBJS-A, Murray et al, 1993)      – 67 patients w/ mean kyphotic angle 71° for average 32 years (compared w/ age-            matched controls)

          – Back pain more intense and localized in thoracic spine

    – Had less demanding jobs, less extension of thoracic spine

    – Similar, however, overall quality of life; little preoccupation w/ appearance

          – Higher incidence of restrictive lung disease kyphotic curves >100°

    –           Bradford et al(1977) reported 50% incidence severe pain w/ increased incidence pain when kyphosis centered over upper lumbar spine

    –           Lowe et al(1987) reported severe deformity and back pain as common sequelae in adolescents who went untreated


  • Ranges from observation to anterior and posterior reconstructive surgery


  • Anti-inflammatory medications – useful short-term adjunct
  • Exercise – extension or postural exercises will not improve or halt progression of fixed deformity, but thoracic extension program combined w/ aerobic exercise may improve physical conditioning and decrease pain
  • Bracing -Typically reserved for patients w/ 1 yr or more of skeletal growth remaining (Risser’s stage 3 or below)

    -can provide up to 50% correction of deformity but gradual loss of correction over time

          – 45° can be used as threshold (Sachs, 1987)

          – Milwaukee-style brace (neck ring and anterior and posterior uprights connected to pelvic girdle)

          – Obtain lateral radiograph to confirm proper fit w/ f/u in 3-4 wks for brace check, then every 4-6 mo

    – Sachs et al (1987): 1) 120 patients f/u >5 yrs after brace discontinued, 69% still had improvement 3° or more from initial radiograph  2) When deformity ³74°,         brace treatment failed

          – Role of bracing in skeletally mature patient less clear


  • Adolescent w/ curve ³75° despite appropriate bracing may be candidate
  • Goals of treatment: safely obtain solid arthrodesis throughout length of kyphosis w/ correction of deformity
  • Posterior-only, anterior-only, or combined anterior-posterior approach
  • Abnormal kyphosis corrected by surgically shortening posterior column or lengthening anterior column or both

Anterior-only approach

  • Described by Kostuik (1988), less widely used
  • Anterior diskectomy and interbody fusion and anterior instrumentation w/ Harrington distraction system augmented by postop bracing
  • 36 patients – reduction of mean preop deformity of 75.5° to 60°

Posterior-only approach

  • Advantages: decreased EBL and surgical time, no risks of thoracotomy
  • Disadvantages: higher rate of pseudoarthrosis, less correction
  • Recommended approach for flexible deformity that corrects on hyperextension to <50°; may add segmental fixation and posterior facetectomy for greater deformities

Anterior-Posterior approach

  • For more rigid deformities (>75°) that does not correct to <50° on hyperextension lateral view*;* one sitting or staged
  • Anterior approach open or thoracoscopically, right side to avoid great vessels
  • Anterior release and interbody fusion performed on all levels that are wedged or have a narrowed disk space
  • Posterior correction performed by compression technique or leverage technique
  • Posterior fusion w/ dual rods segmentally attached to compression instrumentation is treatment of choice, preceded by anterior release and interbody fusion
  • Harrington compression system vs. segmental posterior systems (Cotrel-Dubousset, Texas Scottish-Rite Hospital, Isola) that obviate need for postop brace
  • Overall correction should not exceed 50% initial deformity or <40° – reduces risk of proximal and distal junctional kyphosis

Lumbar Scheuermann’s disease

  • Less common
  • More often causes back pain on mechanical basis (more common in athletes and manual laborers)
  • Pain often self-limited
  • Same radiographic findings but NOT associated w/ vertebral wedging


  • Scheuermann’s Kyphosis in Adolescents and Adults: Diagnosis and Management.  Tribus, C.B.  JAAOS.  1998; 6:36-43
  • Scheuermann’s Disorder.  Koop, S.E.  OKU: Pediatrics 2.
  • Review of Orthopaedics, 4thed.  Miller, M.D.
  • Cambell’s Operative Orthopaedics.