For webpages there are at least three levels of quality assessment that may be desirable. The first would be provenance, the second content coverage and the third the quality of that coverage. The "provenance" quality is most easily assessed. Silberg et al. (1997)
proposed the four criteria of authorship, disclosure, attribution and currency. While these are important, it remains true that a site could satisfy all these criteria and still be misleading or inadequate. Clough & Oliver (2002)
Last Updated on June 27, 2024
🔗 Knowledge Graph & Clinical Correlates
OrthopaedicsOne Living Semantic Network🩺 Clinical Conditions & Indications
- Wigns There are three categories of diagnostic data collected during the physical examination (sign, symptom, and that in between)...
- Why have a privacy policy for my office Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne General Orthopaedics Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
- Why have a practice website Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne General Orthopaedics Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
- Who should undergo biopsy of a bone lesion Patient selection for a biopsy is important: It is intended to confirm the radiologic diagnosis in patients with...
💼 Practice Management & Professional Operations
- Winthrop M. Phelps History of Orthopaedics
- Willis Cohoon Campbell History of Orthopaedics
- William Waugh History of Orthopaedics
- William Ward Plummer History of Orthopaedics
- William Thomas Gordon Pugh History of Orthopaedics
- William Stewart Halsted History of Orthopaedics
- William Stevenson Baer History of Orthopaedics
- William Morant Baker History of Orthopaedics